系统评价-Meta分析-指南必备史上最全方法学质量评价工具

系统评价-Meta分析-指南必备:史上最全方法学质量评价工具

2020年度NSFC申请,已经拉开了序幕:1月16日,2020年NSFC网上填写正式开始:1)2020年NSFC网上填报正式开始(含填报步骤);2)个人简历,5项代表性论著之外,请勿再列论文和专著 | 2020年申请新规定。
由武汉大学中南医院循证与转化医学中心推出的方法学文章:“Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better”,已于2020年2月29日,由SCI期刊Military Medical Research正式发表。文章官网链接:
https://mmrjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8

PubMed链接:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32111253

本文从随机试验、非随机干预研究、观察性研究、诊断性试验、质性研究、经济学评价、结果评价工具、预测研究等方法学质量评价工具角度做了分析,属目前史上最全方法学质量评价工具:系统评价-Meta分析-指南必备。可从该文摘要了解概况:
Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment is an important step before study initiation usage. Therefore, accurately judging study type is the first priority, and the choosing proper tool is also important. In this review, we introduced methodological quality assessment tools for randomized controlled trial (including individual and cluster), animal study, non-randomized interventional studies (including follow-up study, controlled before-and-after study, before-after/ pre-post study, uncontrolled longitudinal study, interrupted time series study), cohort study, case-control study, cross-sectional study (including analytical and descriptive), observational case series and case reports, comparative effectiveness research, diagnostic study, health economic evaluation, prediction study (including predictor finding study, prediction model impact study, prognostic prediction model study), qualitative study, outcome measurement instruments (including patient – reported outcome measure development, content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity/ measurement invariance, reliability, measurement error, criterion validity, hypotheses testing for construct validity, and responsiveness), systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline. The readers of our review can distinguish the types of medical studies and choose appropriate tools. In one word, comprehensively mastering relevant knowledge and implementing more practices are basic requirements for correctly assessing the methodological quality.要写系统评价/Meta分析、指南,要使用它们及随机试验、非随机干预研究、观察性研究、诊断性试验、质性研究、经济学评价、结果评价工具、预测研究,都可以用此文中所列方法学。
文章引用格式为:
Ma LL, Wang YY, Yang ZH, Huang D, Weng H, Zeng XT. Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? Mil Med Res. 2020 Feb 29;7(1):7.
来来来,点击“阅读原文”,或二维码,可直接下载本文!

阅读原文

赞(0)
未经允许不得转载:第一SCI网 » 系统评价-Meta分析-指南必备史上最全方法学质量评价工具

评论 抢沙发

评论前必须登录!